Banning
needs to end
COMMENTARY
By Laura McFarland
Harry Potter books contain mysticism. Ban
them.
A Separate Peace has references to suicide.
Ban it.
The Face on the Milk Carton contains challenges
to authority. Ban it.
The list of supposedly inappropriate books that people
challenged, restricted, or banned in libraries and classrooms
in Texas last year only gets worse from here.
Parents, students, local citizens and school officials
in 71 Texas school districts attempted to remove 134
books, including How to Eat Fried Worms,
Uncle Toms Cabin, the Bible and Websters
Dictionary, according to an annual report released on
the American Civil Liberties Union Web site.
Every couple of minutes, as I scrolled through the list
of these books and read the asinine reasons that they
were being challenged, I would vent my frustration to
friends in the next room.
About halfway down the page, I screamed. Literally.
My favorite book, The Power of One, by Bryce
Courtenay, had been challenged for profanity, sexual
content and violence. This book, which I first read
as a freshman in high school, had the biggest impact
on me of any book I have ever read, and people from
one Texas high school say it should be banned.
People who brought challenges like these say they were
motivated by the desire to protect children from inappropriate
language and sexual content. Their motives are thus
commendable.
But they were wrong to do so.
They were wrong, not because I love this book and many
of the other books on this list, but because they have
no right to censor a persons freedom of expression,
which includes the freedom to read, by labeling books
controversial or objectionable
and limiting access to reading material.
They were wrong because school boards, librarians and
a few parents do not have the right to impose their
morals on students in an entire district by deciding
what they should or should not read.
Parents and only parents have the right
to restrict the access of their children to certain
texts. Parents getting more involved in what their children
are reading should be just as encouraged as knowing
what they watch on television and who their friends
are. But allowing one group of people to decide that
they know what is best for everyone elses children
should be stopped.
Tomorrow is the last day of Banned Book Week, an event
that has dedicated the last week in September to celebrating
the freedom to read every year since 1982. Libraries
and bookstores across the state are setting up displays
and readings to highlight some of these so-called objectionable
books.
I challenge you, the reader, to take a look at this
list of challenged books, to ask your local librarian
about banned books, and to check one out. See if you
think someone else should have the right to decide what
you should be allowed to read.
Managing Editor Laura McFarland is a senior news-editorial
journalism and English major from Houston.
|
|