John
Walker Lindh pleads innocent
Trial
date to be set Friday
By
Larry Margasak
Associated Press
ALEXANDRIA,
Va. John Walker Lindh pleaded innocent Wednesday to a 10-count
federal indictment that charged him with conspiring to kill Americans
and aiding Osama bin Ladens terrorist network. The widow of
a CIA officer killed shortly after questioning Lindh called him
a traitor.
Not
guilty, sir, Lindh answered, after U.S. District Judge T.S.
Ellis III asked, How do you plead to all the charges.
It
was Lindhs third appearance at the federal courthouse since
he was brought back to the United States by military aircraft on
Jan. 24. His parents, Frank Lindh and Marilyn Walker, were there
for the arraignment, as they had been for his previous court appearances.
Also present were Johnny and Gail Spann, the parents of CIA officer
Johnny Mike Spann, killed in a prison uprising in Mazar
e-Sharif in November, and his widow, Shannon Spann.
Lindh
no longer has the shaved head that he had in his initial appearances
and his black hair, still closely cropped, was starting to grow
back. He was clean-shaven, a sharp contrast from the long beard
and long hair seen in televised images of him from Afghanistan.
Lindh
answered, Yes and Yes and Correct,
sir, when the judge asked whether he had seen the indictment
and had reviewed it with his attorneys.
If
convicted on the charges, the 21-year-old Lindh could face life
imprisonment.
Ellis
did not set a trial date, but said that as a target, he would like
jury selection to begin in late August. He scheduled a hearing for
Friday to set a trial date and go over a pretrial schedule, which
would likely include hearings on handling classified information
in the case.
The
government and defense counsel had suggested in motions Tuesday
that the trial not begin before mid-November, but Ellis said that
was too long to wait.
November
is too far, Ellis said, adding that he was thinking of a trial
in September.
Assistant
U.S. Attorney Randy Bellows said he expected the governments
case to take two weeks.
In
asking for a November trial, the defense had said it would need
time to conduct overseas investigations, handle classified information,
argue for suppression of evidence and allow the effects of prejudicial
publicity to fade.
Federal
prosecutors said they disagreed with a delay due to publicity, but
accepted the other reasons for a November date.
Until
now the two sides have agreed on little, with prosecutors portraying
Lindh as a cold-blooded killer who hated America, and the defense
contending he signed up to fight the anti-Taliban northern alliance,
not the United States.
The
defense said in the motion that due to the high level of prejudicial
publicity, passage of time will be necessary in order that the defendant
receive a fair and impartial trial.
|