TheSkiffView
RESPECT
Dont show captured until
families know
With war come inevitable causalities. We knew that.
We expected that. Yet we were still surprised at the
gruesome images of dead American soldiers shown on television.
An Army convey was apparently ambushed in Southern Iraq
Sunday, resulting in the capture of at least five soldiers
and the death of several more. Video of the captured
soldiers and close-up shots of the dead were shown on
Iraqi state television and also on Al Jazeera, the Qatar-based
network.
American networks have not shown full images of the
dead, but some chose to air Iraqi interviews with the
captured soldiers, some who appeared to be frightened
and wounded. The Fort Worth Star-Telegram ran photos
of the captured five, but noted that they hadnt
been officially identified by the Pentagon. The paper
also told readers it would not publish disturbing images
of those killed or captured by Iraqi forces.
During an interview on Face the Nation Sunday,
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, along with the rest
of the nation, saw footage of the captured soldiers.
A Pentagon spokesman asked the network not to show the
soldiers faces. Later, the other networks agreed
not to show the faces until families were notified.
War coverage is bound to incite debate. Do we want to
know the realities of war, even if it includes the images
of dead soldiers? Or do we want to keep the action at
an arms length, by not getting close to the human
toll that war takes?
However, identifying the dead or captured to mass television
audiences before family members are notified crosses
the line. Imagine sitting at home, watching the news
because you have a family member serving in the military.
Youre already nervous for their safety. Then imagine,
seeing that loved ones face as theyre interviewed
by captors. Theyre being asked for their name
and hometown and obviously look frightened.
It apparently happened to one soldiers mother.
That shouldnt be a reality, even as we face the
consequences of a television war.
|
|