Flags
shouldnt reflect injustice
Mississippis decision to keep Confederate emblem
is arrogant
By Emily E.
Ward
Skiff Staff
In the field
of journalism, minding what you say and how you say it is a top
priority for all professionals in the domain, whether they are reporters,
broadcasters, editors or whether they work in public relations.
Words have meaning, is probably the phrase I have heard
the most from my journalism professors during the past two years.
|
Correy
Jefferson - Skiff Staff
|
So it is no
shock that I think people in other work areas could learn this lesson
from members in the media.
Communication,
both verbal and non-verbal, is the glue that holds together this
country. Being a nation with immense pride, the United States is
clearly a place where communication through symbols such as country
and state flags is considered sacred. Why a state would willingly
keep a tarnished symbol as the dominant design in their flag is
something far beyond my comprehension.
But last week,
voters in Mississippi overwhelmingly decided to keep the Confederate
emblem as the principal layout on their state flag. According to
an Associated Press article, 65 percent of Mississippi voters opted
to keep the states old flag instead of adopting one that would
replace the Confederate symbol with 20 white stars on a blue background.
I have never
been a big fan of tradition, but I do think some things should be
left as they are if they promote something that is positive. Keeping
a symbol that represents hate and discrimination in order to retain
what some see as tradition and pride is nothing less than ghastly.
Why would anybody
want something that carries an aura of pain and injustice to be
the paramount symbol of their state?
The collective
statements I read from opponents of the new flag design was that
the traditional 1894 flag represents their heritage and was the
flag they saluted as children. Although these arguments are valid
and quite understandable, I would think they would not want to keep
saluting a symbol that represented a time of hatred and injustice
if it had become tarnished with ignorance and injustice. If the
Texas state flag was the primary representation of racial discrimination
in the south, I would be the first to say it is time for a change.
Those people
from Mississippi who want to keep the old flag are usually the ones
who have immense pride and love for their state. Being a Texan,
I dont think I can insult those feelings of vainglory. But
I would also think that if somebody loved their state, he or she
would not want to associate it with any traditions that create negative
images of it. In fact, I would think somebody would be admirable
if he or she gave up pride to replace the bad with the good.
One of the
cases that comes to mind when I think about this situation is what
happened with the Texas A&M University bonfire in 1999. The
people associated with A&M have more pride than all the people
in Texas combined, and yet that difficult step in cutting off tradition
to commemorate those who died was made almost immediately after
the accident.
And that was
done for a one-time incident that 12 individuals.
Perhaps the
voters in Mississippi should think about the number of people who
are insulted by the Confederate symbol around the nation. Maybe
they should decide which is more important: pride or humanity. Either
way, there is a lot to say about arrogance in the state of Mississippi,
and it can be easily seen by looking at their state flag.
Emily
E. Ward is a junior math and news-editorial major from Springtown.
She can be reached at (e.e.ward@student.tcu.edu).
Editorial
policy: The content of the Opinion page does not necessarily represent
the views of Texas Christian University. Unsigned editorials represent
the view of the TCU Daily Skiff editorial board. Signed letters,
columns and cartoons represent the opinion of the writers and do
not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board.
Letters
to the editor: The Skiff welcomes letters to the editor for publication.
Letters must be typed, double-spaced, signed and limited to 250
words. To submit a letter, bring it to the Skiff, Moudy 291S;
mail it to TCU Box 298050; e-mail it to skiffletters@tcu.edu or
fax it to 257-7133. Letters must include the authors classification,
major and phone number. The Skiff reserves the right to edit or
reject letters for style, taste and size restrictions.
|