Pale
skin puts best side forward
New reports on tanning booths reveal the inside dirt,
literally
Never in
my life have I been more proud to be pale. Suddenly, an aspect of
my physical appearance thats been a source of uneasiness for
years has become a distinguishing quality I can be pleased with.
After reading
the Sundays Fort Worth Star-Telegram, I realized the risks
definitely outweigh the results. I always knew about the increased
chances of getting skin cancer and the skin-aging effects that indoor
tanning can cause. For these reasons, and because of a complete
lack of income, I always avoided conforming to the social pressure
of paying for a nice tan.
However, I
never even considered the other dangers that indoor tanning presents.
According to
the Star-Telegrams review of Texas Department of Health inspection
records of Tarrant County tanning salons for the past three years,
all 42 inspected salons violated state regulations, and 39 of them
were cited for serious health violations. Most of these salons are
repeat offenders. Also, 23 of 25 salons that went out of business
in the past three years had a history of serious health violations.
The basic gist
of these violations is that tanning salons do a very poor job of
cleaning tanning beds. Among other serious infringements was cracked
acrylic on a bed, and the failure to provide clean protective eye
wear, which can lead to cataracts and eye infections. The acrylic
serves as a filter for the ultraviolet radiation, and the customer
is receiving the ultraviolet light at full strength when its
cracked, which can cause serious second and third-degree burns.
My favorite
aspect of the violations is how unclean tanning beds can spread
disease. Not only can they spread athletes foot, jock itch,
yeast infections, lice and various other funguses, but they have
been known to spread herpes as well. In the article, Brett Coldiron,
professor of dermatology for the University of Cincinnati, said
ultraviolet light kills immune cells for herpes and people can unknowingly
shed the disease when lying on tanning beds.
For those lucky
few, some customers may even be paying for both lice and herpes
in one sitting. After all, I never have been able to pass up a two-for-one
special. On an optimistic note, at least people can blame their
fever blisters on their tanning experiences and not their social
ones.
I was once
somewhat embarrassed to go shirtless in public, but now I can laugh
at all of the perfectly tanned people and their concealed funguses
and infections. Sure, my pasty skin tone may not be very pleasing
to the eye, but at least it doesnt burn when I urinate.
This is why
I propose people stick with natural sunlight and suntan lotion instead
of resorting to costly, in more ways than one, fake baking. Even
if people dont have a great deal of time to lay out in the
sun, Im pretty sure just having a moderate tan outweighs the
risk of cancer, burns and aforementioned diseases. What may be even
more important for some other than their health is that you save
money by sticking with natural tanning methods as well.
After
all, I cant remember the last time I was laying poolside and
thought to myself, Gee, I hope I dont catch any venereal
diseases lying out here.
Jordan Blum is a sophomore broadcast journalism major from New
Orleans.
He can be reached at (j.d.blum@student.tcu.edu).
Editorial
policy: The content of the Opinion page does not necessarily represent
the views of Texas Christian University. Unsigned editorials represent
the view of the TCU Daily Skiff editorial board. Signed letters,
columns and cartoons represent the opinion of the writers and do
not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board.
Letters
to the editor: The Skiff welcomes letters to the editor for publication.
Letters must be typed, double-spaced, signed and limited to 250
words. To submit a letter, bring it to the Skiff, Moudy 291S;
mail it to TCU Box 298050; e-mail it to skiffletters@tcu.edu or
fax it to 257-7133. Letters must include the authors classification,
major and phone number. The Skiff reserves the right to edit or
reject letters for style, taste and size restrictions.
|