| Execution request is not appropriate 
              Death of McVeigh turns into a spectacle, draws too 
              many people to watch
 April 19, 1995, 9:02 a.m. This is one of those 
              dates and times that we, as Americans, will always remember and 
              know exactly where we were and what we were doing. This is the day 
              that the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City was 
              bombed. It was also the day that many Americans realized our biggest 
              enemy may not always live in another country, but instead right 
              across the street.  Six years later, the nation will try and finally 
              put this unthinkable crime behind us when the government executes 
              a man convicted of the horrendous and deadly bombing.  Timothy McVeigh, one of the most hated men in 
              the country, will die from lethal injection May 16 in Terre Haute, 
              Ind.Lethal injection. What a nice, quiet and peaceful way to die. Unlike 
              the way all of his victims died on that fateful day in the spring 
              of 1995.
  McVeigh, who has been in federal prison since 
              he was convicted of the deadliest act of terrorism on U.S. soil, 
              dropped all of his appeals in December and asked for a quick execution. 
               A quick execution? Are you kidding? A man kills 
              168 innocent people and injured more than 500 people, and he wants 
              to tell us when he wants to die. What has our country come to?  Nevertheless, the government has set a date, and 
              the last hope that McVeigh has now is to wait and see if President 
              Bush will grant him clemency, which he wont do if he knows 
              whats good for him.  Once the date was set, the government sent out 
              1,100 letters to the bombing survivors and to the victims 
              families asking them if they would want to attend the execution. 
              Two hundred and fifty people said they would.  Two hundred and fifty people. Thats seems 
              like a lot of people when it comes to wanting to watch an execution, 
              but if you think of how many people were invited to watch, it really 
              isnt that many, is it?  The problem lies with the fact that the number 
              of people who would like to watch the execution. Since there are 
              so many people who would like to attend, the government has to figure 
              out where they will all sit.  The execution room at the federal prison holds 
              only eight people. Thats just 242 seats too small. The governments 
              possible solution to the problem is to put the execution on a closed-circuit 
              television, and let the audience watch from another room.  Now I realize that for many of the victims to 
              get on with their lives they need to know that McVeigh is dead, 
              but do they really need to see it live and in person? Eight hundred 
              and fifty people who were invited to attend didnt think so.  Its weird to think the government actually 
              invited people to watch the execution. Is an execution 
              something that you can really invite somebody to watch? 
               Its like the government is throwing a party 
              with popcorn and soda to let us know they have finally gotten rid 
              of this man. Or the government might be throwing this big party 
              with a big crowd to let us know they still know how to carry out 
              a federal execution, especially since they have not achieved 
              one since 1963.  McVeigh needs to die for his crime, but should 
              it be carried out in front of so many people? Should he be allowed 
              to tell us when he would like to die? I dont think so.  Assistant News Editor Hemi Ahluwalia 
              is a junior broadcast journalism major from Stephenville.She can be reached at (h.ahluwalia@student.tcu.edu).
 
 Editorial policy: The content of the Opinion 
              page does not necessarily represent the views of Texas Christian 
              University. Unsigned editorials represent the view of the TCU Daily 
              Skiff editorial board. Signed letters, columns and cartoons represent 
              the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily reflect the opinion 
              of the editorial board.  Letters to the editor: The Skiff welcomes letters 
              to the editor for publication. Letters must be typed, double-spaced, 
              signed and limited to 250 words. To submit a letter, bring 
              it to the Skiff, Moudy 291S; mail it to TCU Box 298050; e-mail it 
              to skiffletters@tcu.edu or fax it to 257-7133. Letters must include 
              the authors classification, major and phone number. The Skiff 
              reserves the right to edit or reject letters for style, taste and 
              size restrictions. |