New crosswalk ineffectively placed
University, city need to combine walkways to help
students, staff
Sometime last October, I noticed that a City of
Fort Worth traffic construction crew had painted a new crosswalk
at the south end of the intersection of Bowie Street and South University
Drive. The existing crosswalk at the north end of the intersection,
which was in dire need of repair, was simply sandblasted away.
I found this event rather curious since the new
crosswalk seemed to only benefit the pedestrians who intended on
visiting the retail strip located near the intersection, whereas
the old crosswalk served as a major crossing point for students
going to classes on the south side of campus.
Diana Vazquez, Fort Worth Traffic Operations Coordinator,
said the City of Fort Worth worked with Willet Stallworth, associate
vice chancellor for Plant Management, and she determined the safest
decision for students would be to do away with the old crosswalk
and establish a new crosswalk on the other side of the intersection.
Additionally, all cars on Bowie Street would be
prevented from turning left onto University, which would keep them
from driving over the new crosswalk thus reducing the amount
of oncoming traffic pedestrians would have to negotiate.
At first, this reasoning seems to make sense. However,
on second thought, it is apparent that even though the new crosswalk
has been created to keep students out of harms way, a majority
of students will continue to use the walkway designated by the old
crosswalk.
Basically, when you have two minutes to get to
class, are you going to go well out of your way and use the new
crosswalk or going to use the quicker approach and simply go straight
across the street where the old crosswalk existed? I would be willing
to bet that most students would choose the second option.
Therefore, it is imperative the City of Fort Worth
and TCU not compromise students safety by trying to ignore
one of the major walkways of the campus.
On another note, it appears this situation does
not solely apply to students, but to Physical Plant workers as well.
I have noticed several occasions this semester where Physical Plant
workers in their Kia and Daihatsu transport vehicles were crossing
University Drive at the intersection in question through the old
crosswalk.
It is quite obvious these workers are not trying
to purposely break the law, but instead they are forced to cross
at this point because the new crosswalk does not have ramp access
points on both sides of University Drive like the previous crosswalk
afforded.
While this factor may have simply been an oversight by TCU and the
city, it still remains as an argument as to why the old crosswalk
should be reinstated.
Just last year, a car struck a student while he
was crossing the street using the old crosswalk. This accident happened
in the evening, and the fact that the old crosswalk was deteriorating
to the point that its reflective material was difficult to see in
low light might have contributed to the accidents occurrence.
It seems rather absurd that instead of repairing
the reflective material on this crosswalk, the city destroyed it
and placed a new one on the other side of the intersection. However,
it might have been more cost effective and smarter to just repaint
the old crosswalk.
To please the students, the city and TCU, the best solution for
this situation would be to reinstall the old crosswalk, and use
it in conjunction with the new crosswalk. Moreover, ramps should
be installed at the entry points for the new crosswalk to benefit
Physical Plant workers and any students using wheelchairs. At TCU,
safety should be paramount, and this little step can do nothing
but further that goal.
Robert Davis is a senior computer
science major from Garland.
He can be reached at (r.d.davis@student.tcu.edu).
Editorial policy: The content of the Opinion
page does not necessarily represent the views of Texas Christian
University. Unsigned editorials represent the view of the TCU Daily
Skiff editorial board. Signed letters, columns and cartoons represent
the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily reflect the opinion
of the editorial board.
Letters to the editor: The Skiff welcomes letters
to the editor for publication. Letters must be typed, double-spaced,
signed and limited to 250 words. To submit a letter, bring
it to the Skiff, Moudy 291S; mail it to TCU Box 298050; e-mail it
to skiffletters@tcu.edu or fax it to 257-7133. Letters must include
the authors classification, major and phone number. The Skiff
reserves the right to edit or reject letters for style, taste and
size restrictions.
|