Some
staff should stop whining
The Staff Assembly is still relentlessly
continuing its inappropriate monetary demands and refuses
to consider TCUs generosity during the recent
economic troubles in mind.
COMMENTARY
Dave Mestemaker
The Staff Assembly is still relentlessly continuing
its inappropriate monetary demands and refuses to consider
TCUs generosity during the recent economic troubles
in mind.
Ive
been working at TCU for about two years. During that
time, Ive sort of followed the activities of the
Staff Assembly, primarily via meeting minutes and Skiff
articles. And until now, as hard as it has been at times,
Ive quietly kept my mouth shut as Ive listened
to and/or read comments from Staff Assembly representatives,
especially as they relate to salaries and benefits for
non-exempt university employees. But after reading the
article on the front page of the Nov. 6 Skiff, I can
no longer remain silent.
Even
during my short tenure here I have witnessed Chancellor
Michael Ferrari and other prominent members of this
university go to extraordinary lengths to accommodate
the Staff Assembly, especially in efforts to improve
the quality of life for non-exempt employees. But it
seems that no matter what the university does, its
never enough, at least for certain Staff Assembly representatives.
Never in my life have I heard so much whining or seen
so much ungratefulness. Its truly disgraceful
and irresponsible.
Statements
in the article like Its neither ethical
nor responsible to pay wages that keep people working
in poverty are totally inappropriate, and serve
as a slap in the face to the honest and sincere efforts
of this university. But even more than that, where does
it say that the university owes anyone here a living?
Or that employees should be paid without regard for
education, qualifications, experience, work ethic, etc?
How many employees were forced to sign their employment
agreements (where they agreed to accept a specific salary
offered by the university) when they started working
here?
Another
comment in the article says, If you work full
time, whatever your job is (my emphasis), its
essential that you should be able to support you and
your family on one income. Has anyone told McDonalds
(and every other organization that pays at or below
the minimum salary) this revelation? And does that mean
that if I have 10 kids, then I get paid that much more
than the person working next to me with just one child?
And what about the seemingly lost concept of personal
responsibility? How about at least some level of accountability
for personal decisions, or opportunities not taken advantage
of, that place an employee in the position he/she is
in today?
While
I acknowledge that the Staff Assembly has probably done
some nice things for the community in the name of the
university, it remains extremely disappointing to read
the kinds of comments from the Staff Assembly as expressed
above. Again, they are reckless and unfair, as they
do an injustice to the many positive efforts of this
university on behalf of its employees. And for any who
may still disagree with my assessment, just take a look
around you dont have to look too far to
find a sputtering economy that has been depressed for
the past two years, with layoffs galore across the country.
In
short, enough is enough. Its time for the Staff
Assembly to start being fair and realistic with the
university. Stop labeling it as unethical (this isnt
the first time the Staff Assembly rep has applied that
label); cease whining over salaries and benefits (which
in total are very generous); and be thankful for all
you have been given, not the least of which is continued
employment during very tenuous times.
And
if that cant happen, and the Staff Assembly chooses
to continue to push the narrow, self-serving position
represented in the article, then I would go so far as
to suggest that it be disbanded as an organization on-campus.
Guest
columnist Dave Mestemaker is Director of Resources at
the Physical Plant. He can be contacted at (d.mestamaker@tcu.edu).
|