| 
        
          | 
               
                |  | Friday, 
                  February 13, 2004 |   
                |  |  |  |  
          |  |  
          | 
               
                |  | 
                     
                      | U.S. 
                        wars need justification 
 COMMENTARY
 Zack Hemenway
 
 The 
                        United States should not go to war unless the call to 
                        arms is completely justified.
 
 The 1970s military debacle of the Vietnam War showed the 
                        country that we shouldnt risk American lives unless 
                        there is an imminent threat to our country or to the world.
 
 Before bringing the United States into the Iraq conflict, 
                        President Bush tried to convince the country that such 
                        a threat existed. He told the country how Saddam Hussein 
                        had stockpiled weapons of mass destruction and stressed 
                        the importance of a pre-emptive strike.
 
 The strategy worked. The plan to go to Iraq had bipartisan 
                        support.
 
 Nearing the end of the conflict, it was clear that these 
                        weapons never existed. In recent months, leaders such 
                        as Secretary of State Colin Powell have been forced to 
                        concede that no such weapons are likely to be found in 
                        Iraq, while Bush dodges any questions about weapons of 
                        mass destruction.
 
 Instead, the party line has shifted to the politically 
                        savvy stance of, the world is a better place without 
                        Saddam Hussein leading Iraq.
 
 Its impossible to dispute this. But its a 
                        distraction from the real issue: Was the war justified?
 
 Of course its great for the world to get rid of 
                        an insane dictator. But its not worth risking American 
                        lives unless a threat to the safety of our country exists.
 
 Hussein was a tyrannical dictator, but such dictators 
                        are not unique to Iraq. Just ask North Koreas Kim 
                        Jong II or the authoritarian leaders of many African countries.
 
 The world is a better place argument doesnt 
                        provide much solace for the families of the nearly 300 
                        American soldiers who died in Iraq  lives cut short 
                        for a cause that is more political than moral.
 
 War is the most dangerous of human action, capable of 
                        ripping the world apart at the seams. Every time we take 
                        arms against another country under false pretenses, we 
                        come one step closer to permanently destroying the tenuous 
                        peace that exists in the world today.
 
 Zack Hemenway is a columnist from the University Daily 
                        Kansan at the University of Kansas. This column was distributed 
                        by U-Wire.
 |  |  |  |  
          |  |  |